The slab system in power tariff should be rectified. Higher charges should be on the additional consumption and not on the whole just like income taxes are on the additional incomes. DBT of subsidies is better than the free power concept. In the free power concept often the farmers end up getting no power at all. Also DBT makes one feel one really got something as a gift rather than one took something as a right.

There should mandatory clauses stating that the power distribution companies should carry out substantial degree of research. A percentage of their business amount should be spent on appropriate research in house or at universities or labs. Power companies should not be merely agents doing paper work, and billing and profit making or real estate activities.

ओम्, माननीय मोदी जी,
हम सभी भारतवासियों को ईमानदार होना चाहिए,बिजली डिपार्टमेंट में कार्य करने वाले को बिजली के बिल देना चाहिए,वैसे ही डिपार्मेंट के लोग बिजली कि बहुत ही खपत करते है जो कि बेवजह होता है,बिजली की चोरी भी बहुत होती है,आम जनता भी बहुत ऐसे अनुचित कार्य करती है,
सब से पहले सभी को ईमानदार होने की आवश्यकता है,देश के सब सरकार के साथ बेईमानी नहीं करनी चाहिए।
घरों में भी सभी नागरिकों को चाहिए की बिना मतलब के बिजली का उपयोग नहीं होना चाहिए,समझदारी के साथ बिजली का उपयोग होना चाहिए।

There should be some scope spelt out clearly for power distributions to be made underground. Or there should be some scope at least to ensure that the electromagnetic waves do not cause damage to life.

1. At first all uncovered wair should be cable in locality area.
2. For BPL families arrange solar or free electric bill limit should be 100 units/m.Because some people help to thief electric.As a result electric distribution company losing profit.
3. Electric bill in Rural and urban should be ₹3.50/unit for 300units/ 3months.Comercial bill should be ₹5/unit for 300units/3 months.
4. For send fack bill/wrong bill need a tough rules and penalty(1lakh/unit) for electric distribution company

Pl. make young, dynamic, technically qualified, fearless fresh minds who are up to date in their knowledge on the subject, and for whom their and their country’s future is at stake, the absolute decision makers in all the teams proposed. It is harmful to make them subservient and is counterproductive. It likely to ill serve the common good.

It is a pity that the supreme court or other judges of various categories are pulled everywhere even when matters are substantially technical and commercial. To put chief secretaries and others who are always busy is also a waste. Also judges who take decades to comprehend and solve even obvious issues are once again chosen to head matters here too. Here time is the essence. So pl. remove all such office bearers from the various committees from this proposal.

I see no mention of any roof top power generation, two way meters, micro producers and their roles or any such crucial matters regarding solar power related infrastructure. It is a pity.

Solar ,solar and solar is the only mantra which can save all and benefit all. Any amendment which is not explicitly forthcoming in this regard is largely a futile one as far as people are concerned and likely to be of little value and will have to be replaced even before it begins to produce any results.

Most of the citizens are not lawers. Before putting out to the public the clauses and their intended efffects should be stated. then we can really give the feed back in the best way. Pl. state will the amendment ensure uninterrupted power supply to those connected ? Will it enable easy hassle free new connections and disconnections?Will it reduce middle men?Will it increase solar power.? Will it reduce cost or at least keep nearly same? If not it is useless and could be harmful.