Home | MyGov

Accessibility
Accessibility Tools
Color Adjustment
Text Size
Navigation Adjustment
Screen Reader iconScreen Reader

Seeking comments on TRAI’s Consultation Paper on Compensation to the Consumers in the Event of Dropped Calls

Seeking comments on TRAI’s Consultation Paper on Compensation to the Consumers in the Event of Dropped Calls
Start Date :
Sep 09, 2015
Last Date :
Sep 22, 2015
00:00 AM IST (GMT +5.30 Hrs)
Submission Closed

In the past one year, consumers, at various fora, have raised the issue of call drops, complaining that their experience of making voice calls has deteriorated. In order to assess ...

In the past one year, consumers, at various fora, have raised the issue of call drops, complaining that their experience of making voice calls has deteriorated. In order to assess the problem, TRAI, in the months of June/ July, 2015, conducted special drive-tests on certain routes of Mumbai and Delhi, in which, it was found that Call Drop Rates of most of the telecom service providers (TSPs) were higher than the permissible limit of ≤2% set by the Authority. TRAI has prescribed financial disincentives on TSPs for failure to meet the quality of service benchmarks (including call drop).

TRAI is of the view that the problem of call drops needs to be examined in its entirety and requires adoption of a multi-pronged approach. It is also considering to make it mandatory for the TSPs to make periodic disclosures about (i) their network capacities and (ii) the steps taken to optimize their networks to address the problem of call drops. On the lines of drive tests undertaken in the cities of Mumbai and Delhi in June/July, 2015, the Authority would be conducting such drive tests across various cities in the country. While several steps are being contemplated, the Authority cannot remain a silent spectator to the problem of call drops encountered by the consumers.

In this background, TRAI has issued a consultation paper and has solicited comments with appropriate justification on the following issues:

Q1: Do you agree that calling consumers should not be charged for a call that got dropped within five seconds? In addition, if the call gets dropped any time after five seconds, the last pulse of the call (minute/second) which got dropped, should not be charged. Please support your viewpoint with reasons along with the methodologies for implementation.

Q2: Do you agree that calling consumer should also be compensated for call drops by the access service providers? If yes, which of the following methods would be appropriate for compensating the consumers upon call drop?

(i) Credit of talk-time in minutes/ seconds
(ii) Credit of talk-time in monetary terms
(iii) Any other method you may like to suggest.

Please support your viewpoint with reasons along with the methodologies for implementation.

Q3: If the answer to the Q2 is in the affirmative, suggest conditions/limits, if any, which should be imposed upon the provision of crediting talk-time upon call drop and usage thereof.

Q4: Is there any other relevant issue which should be considered in the present consultation on the issue of call drops?

Through this forum of My Gov, TRAI invites the comments of stakeholders on the above issues by 21st September, 2015.

Consultation Paper on Call Drops

Press Release regarding Consultation Paper on Call Drops

Reset
Showing 508 Submission(s)
Pulkeet Mehra
Pulkeet Mehra 9 years 3 months ago

1)Yes, calls should be charged if they are dropped before completion of pulse either a minute or second. Each Base station whose call dropping probability is less than TRAI standards should be splited to accommodate more calls with trade off of coverage area temporarily. In long term, operators should install new sites.

2)Credit of talktime in pool balance with validity of minimum 65 days.

3) the validity must be 65 days and minutes/ seconds should be used for std/ local calls

Sree_9
Sree_9 9 years 3 months ago

Q4 many times networks are not available for more than 2-3 days due to service providers technical problem.But while billing time they will count these days also for postpaid customers.

Amrendra_3
Amrendra_3 9 years 3 months ago

Lets get to the root of the problem.
1. Govt. creates an artificial scarcity during spectrum auction - high prices for spectrum - TSPs charge consumers more - but cut throat competition, therefore, quality gets compromised.
2. Why govt. doesn't come clean on radiation from mobile towers, harmful or not - currently due to low no. of towers radiations from towers are increased way beyond the limit - why have towers on pvt. property why can't govt. give them spaces and get money from TSPs.

Abhay Sinha
Abhay Sinha 9 years 3 months ago

1. Consumer should be given credit for the last pulse which dropped.
2. Service provider should be charged INR 50 per dropped call. Unless penalty is stiff service provider would not address the issue.

Aditya Katiyar
Aditya Katiyar 9 years 3 months ago

Q1: Yes, I agree. Consumer should not be charged for the last pulse (minutes) which got dropped.
Q2: (ii) Credit of talk-time in monetary terms.
Q3: Consumer should be credited with call rate of one minute pulse rate according the type of call which was dropped (Local/STD/ISD).

suryasahu21@gmail.com
Surya narayan Sahu 9 years 3 months ago

Compensation must be given to the customers as most of the sufferers are from rural areas where low income people's resides

SUJIT KUMAR SAHOO_1
SUJIT KUMAR SAHOO_1 9 years 3 months ago

whats the use of charging a call which went wayward in mid talk and the message could not be conveyed in a proper way.!!!???

maverick.aragon@gmail.com
Ashish Pandey 9 years 3 months ago

1. Yes, such calls/pulse should not be charged. The point stands valid because the very purpose of phone call is not fulfilled in that particular pulse.

2. Amount should be credited back in customer account in monetory terms. Additionally, service tax for that particular pulse tariff should also be credited as network provider has failed to offer appropriate service.

3.A log should be prepared for call drops areawise and should be periodically published publicly, service provider wise

Nikhil Kumar_51
Nikhil Kumar_51 9 years 3 months ago

Sir Q1) my opinon is yes can charge but in terms of per second cost and sir but telecom authorities are charging more amount per second so please bring it down especially airtel